Thursday, January 14, 2010

Overhaul of Kansas foster-care system urged

http://www.kansascity.com/115/story/1682382.html?mi_pluck_action=comment_submitted&qwxq=7349812#Comments_Container

Overhaul of Kansas foster-care system urged
By DAVID KLEPPER
Posted on Wed, Jan. 13, 2010 10:55 PM
The Star’s Topeka correspondent
More News
Missouri state children's agency earns national accreditation Two toddlers perish in KCK house fire Judge partially opens jury selection in Roeder trial Overhaul of Kansas foster-care system urged Hall Foundation gives $18 million to KU Cancer Center goal Parents sue fraternity over KU student's death Man convicted of first-degree murder in drug-sale death Karl Brooks named regional administrator for Environmental Protection Agency Runaways pose a quandary for police Tribute Nicholas Christopher Garcia was a kind man of high energy In brief Woman dies of crash injuries; rental property registrations due; UMKC gift Kansas seeks ban on synthetic marijuana; puppy taken from area store now paid for Lotteries Winning numbers for Wednesday, Jan. 13 Former mayoral aide sues Funkhouser, wife and city Missouri Supreme Court restricts laws regulating sex offenders Woman charged after throwing tantrum over burger at midtown McDonald's Independence church sues sheriff's office for taking property in search Kansas City Council considers campaign contribution limits for its own McCaskill committee seeks to overhaul Democrats� superdelegate system Missouri was most efficient in 2008 of using federal aid to recover Medicaid fraud funds TOPEKA Legislation to end Kansas’ privatized foster care system is the latest volley from lawmakers who say the state lacks oversight over the contractors managing such child welfare services.

Dozens of parents who lost custody of their children have complained to lawmakers in recent weeks that the state and its contractor caseworkers remove children without giving sufficient reason or the chance to appeal.

The legislation would stop the state from signing new deals with the foster care contractors. The Johnson County lawmaker behind the new legislation said it’s meant to force contractors to answer questions if they want to keep the state’s business.

“We’re certainly going to get their attention,” said Rep. Mike Kiegerl, an Olathe Republican. “There’s a lack of oversight, a lack of transparency. Nobody ought to have the kind of power these caseworkers have.”

The contractors and the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services say they’re happy to address lawmakers’ concerns.

They note that local police and judges also play a key role in deciding when a child should be removed.

SRS officials promised to investigate the complaints raised by parents. But they stand by the privatized system, which was the first of its kind in the United States when it began in 1996.

“We feel like we have made a lot of accomplishments since privatization,” said SRS spokeswoman Michelle Ponce.

Kyle Kessler, a spokesman for contractor KVC Behavioral HealthCare, said his company will “provide any information that is requested.”

To reach David Klepper, call 785-354-1388 or send e-mail to dklepper@kcstar.com.

1 comment:

  1. The contractors referred to my Rep Mike Kiegerl cannot do their work until after the children are removed from the home by SRS. SRS, judges and the local DAs make the decision to remove the children from the home. These officials are also the ones who determine what must be done for the children to be allowed back home.

    The foster care contractors are responsible to find a place for the children to stay and provide whatever services are needed. The contractors also work with the parents to help them get their children back.

    Sounds like the legislature needs to be educated on how the systems works. Caseworkers have no power. They are under court order to report what is going on with the case. They are court ordered to follow the guidelines established by the court for the children to be reintegrated. When families do not follow court orders, despite their opinion about those orders, the caseworker has no choice but to follow the court orders.

    ReplyDelete